Introduction
In this section of our school improvement plan we provide an overview of the analysis of instructional and organizational effectiveness we conducted to help us identify our school’s strengths and limitations. The results of this analysis are summarized on the following pages. We utilized this information to help us identify ways we could build on our strengths, as well as address the limitations of our school’s instructional and organizational effectiveness, as we developed our school improvement plan.
To assist us in identifying strengths and limitations of our school’s instructional and organizational effectiveness, we administered the “Survey of Instructional and Organizational Effectiveness” based on the NSSE’s Indicators of Schools of Quality. Each member of the faculty and administration completed the survey. Parents also completed the survey.
The results of the survey indicated that our communication between home and school, and the school and the community, are rated very high. Math scores on the PACT have risen steadily over the last five years due to varied instructional strategies and increased use of manipulatives across grade levels.
However, the survey indicated three areas of limitations. While teachers and parents rated our instructional strategies high, there were some concerns about assessment tools used. A variety of assessment methods, that addresses the needs of all learners, should be utilized. The second area of concern was in Language Arts. Specifically, the learning needs of various ability groups within the classroom, and the need for a “common language” for terms used across the grade levels. The final area of concern involves mobile students who transfer in and out during the year. These students need a specialized tutorial program to promote success. A review of performance on the PACT highlighted this critical need.
Summary of Strengths and Supporting Evidence
|
Areas of Strengths |
Evidence |
|
Roebuck communicates with the community through many programs that encourage learning for all members.
|
|
|
Roebuck communicates and makes an effort to include all parents through a variety of genres.
|
|
|
Math, due to many programs and enrichment activities, continues to be an academic strength at Roebuck Elementary School. |
|
|
Character education is emphasized throughout the school year by student participation in a variety of activities.
|
|
Summary of Limitations and Supporting Evidence
|
Areas of Limitations |
Evidence |
|
Methods of assessment need to be more varied and authentic to meet the learning goals and needs of different ability levels.
|
|
|
The learning needs of various ability levels in Language Arts are not effectively addressed in a whole group setting. |
|
|
Instructional strategies and learning activities for mobile students are not well-aligned to the desired school-wide results for student learning. |
|
Analysis of the Overall Instructional and Organizational Effectiveness of Our School
Overall, the instructional practices and organizational conditions of our school are congruent with each other and are well aligned with the school’s mission and beliefs. However, three major areas that need to be strengthened include the following:
· Stronger alignment of instructional strategies and learning activities in Language Arts, in order to attain the desired school-wide results for student learning.
· Improved methods of assessment in order to effectively support our learning goals.
· Implementation of instructional strategies and activities to maximize learning potential for mobile students.
Priorities for Improvement:
o Focus on the instructional strategies, learning activities, and materials in Language Arts that need to be aligned with desired school-wide results for student learning.
o Focus on improved methods of assessment to effectively support our learning goals.
o Focus on instructional strategies and activities to maximize learning potential for mobile students.
RESULTS of Instructional and Organizational Effectiveness Survey
4 = exemplary; 3 = fully functioning and operational; 2 = evidence of progress, but indicators or quality are not full operational; 1 = low level of development and implementation; 0 = no evidence of the indicators of quality
|
|
|
Percent of responses |
|||||
|
Average |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
||
|
Instructional System |
|||||||
|
Curriculum |
|
||||||
|
1. Develops a quality curriculum |
3.6 |
39 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2. Ensures effective implementation and articulation of the curriculum |
3.7 |
37 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
3. Evaluates and renews the curriculum |
3.6 |
34 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Instructional Design |
|||||||
|
4. Aligns instruction with the goals and expectations for student learning |
3.8 |
44 |
16 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
5. Employs data-driven instructional decision making |
3.5 |
32 |
27 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
6. Actively engages student in their learning |
3.5 |
47 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
7. Expands instructional support for student learning |
3.7 |
44 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Assessment |
|
||||||
|
8. Aligns assessments with clearly defined expectations for student learning |
3.6 |
41 |
19 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
9. Defines the purpose of the assessment |
3.6 |
42 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
10. Selects the appropriate method of assessment |
3.4 |
30 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
11. Collects a comprehensive and representative sample of student achievement |
3.5 |
41 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
12. Develops fair assessments and avoids bias and distortion |
3.7 |
45 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Organizational System |
|||||||
|
Educational Agenda |
|||||||
|
1. Facilitates a collaborative process in developing a shared vision |
3.7 |
45 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2. Develops a beliefs and mission that define a compelling purpose and direction |
3.7 |
47 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
3. Defining measureable goals focused on improving student learning |
3.7 |
46 |
14 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Leadership for School Improvement |
|||||||
|
4. Promotes quality instruction by actively supporting teaching and learning |
3.8 |
46 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
5. Develops comprehensive and school wide improvement plans |
3.7 |
45 |
15 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
6. Employs effective decision making |
3.7 |
40 |
21 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
7. Monitors performance through a comprehension assessment system and reflection |
3.7 |
46 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
8. Provides skillful stewardship by ensuring effective management of the organization, operation, and resources of the school |
3.7 |
42 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Community-building |
|
||||||
|
9. Fosters community-building conditions and working relationships within the school |
3.8 |
47 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
10. Extends the school community through collaborative networks of support for student learning |
3.8 |
49 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Culture of Continuous Improvement and Learning |
|||||||
|
11. Build skills and capacity for improvement through comprehensive and ongoing professional development programs |
3.6 |
44 |
16 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
12. Creates the conditions that support productive change |
3.6 |
39 |
20 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|